Summary
This YouTube transcript discusses the crucial role of curriculum in effective teaching. The speaker argues for centralized lesson planning, citing examples of successful schools with highly structured curricula and contrasting them with schools experiencing declining performance due to less structured approaches. The importance of teacher autonomy is also considered, with the speaker emphasizing the need to balance centralized planning with individual teacher creativity. Concerns about overly standardized, pre-packaged curricula that hinder genuine teacher engagement are also raised. Ultimately, the speaker advocates for a well-structured, knowledge-rich curriculum that allows for incremental improvement and teacher input.
What are the implications for teachers?
The implications for teachers of centralized lesson planning and highly specified curriculum include both potential benefits and challenges.
- Time and workload: Teachers spend a lot of time on lesson planning, and the addition of cognitive load theory and other refinements can add to this burden. Centralized lesson planning can potentially alleviate some of this workload by providing teachers with a structured and consistent approach, especially when lesson plans are designed by experienced, skilled teachers.
- Autonomy: Some teachers may resist centralized lesson plans because they value their autonomy and the ability to create their own lessons. However, it is suggested that less experienced teachers could benefit from using well-designed, refined lessons created by experienced teachers. Also, having a set curriculum may reduce the lesson lottery where some classrooms benefit from a teacher’s expertise, while others might not.
- PD and implementation: When teachers receive professional development (PD) on new ideas like cognitive load theory, they may feel burdened by the expectation to apply these ideas to their lessons. To address this, it’s important for teachers to focus on making one change at a time and to identify what they will stop doing in order to make time for new practices.
- Potential for misuse: There is a risk that if lesson plans and resources are too prescriptive, teachers might simply follow the steps without engaging with the content, which is a “lethal mutation” of centralized planning.
- Consistency: Centralized lesson planning can ensure a consistent approach, particularly when students are working together outside of class or across classes. This can promote a common language and understanding of the subject. When a teacher is absent, a central plan would mean that students can refer to a common plan or resource.
- Improved student results: When a structured, consistent approach was implemented with a bound reference, phenomenal results were achieved in that subject.
Listen to the podcast
To listen to the full podcast of our discussion and access the show notes, please click here
View all of Ollie Lovell’s videos:
Click in the top-right corner of the image below to select your video!
