- Title: High Math Anxiety Is Associated With Lower Math Achievement Across 90 Countries: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Representative Student and Adult Samples
- Authors: Martin Brunner, Franzis Preckel, Thomas Götz, Oliver Lüdtke, Lena Keller
- Access the original paper here
- Watch a video overview:
Paper summary
This meta-analysis examines the complex relationship between math anxiety and math achievement using individual participant data from over 2.5 million people across 90 countries. By synthesising decades of international large-scale assessments, the researchers found a consistent negative correlation of r = -.26, indicating that higher anxiety typically aligns with lower performance. The study highlights how this link is influenced by socioeconomic factors, such as a country’s GDP, and by specific psychological factors, such as cognitive interference. While historical data showed stronger negative effects for females, recent findings suggest these gender differences have largely vanished. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that the strength of this relationship fluctuates with individual achievement levels and significant global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, the authors advocate for targeted interventions to reduce anxiety, thereby fostering greater participation in STEM fields and improving essential economic literacy.
If teachers remember one thing from this study, it should be…
High math anxiety and lower math achievement share a reciprocal relationship that creates a self-reinforcing cycle of avoidance and poor performance. To break this cycle, implementing targeted interventions to reduce anxiety is essential for improving learning outcomes and keeping students engaged in STEM.
***Paper Deep Dive***
What are the key technical terms used in the paper?
- Math Anxiety: Feelings of nervousness, dread, or confusion when facing math.
- Math Achievement: Math-related knowledge and skills.
- Individual Participant Data (IPD): Raw, individual-level data used for meta-analysis.
- Cognitive Interference: Anxiety disrupting attentional control and working memory.
What are the characteristics of the participants in the study?
The study analysed over 2.5 million participants from 452 representative probability samples across 90 countries between 1980 and 2022. Participants included both student populations (ranging from 4th to 12th grade) and adult populations (aged 16 to 65).
What does this paper add to the current field of research?
This paper overcomes past methodological limitations by synthesising representative individual participant data from international large-scale assessments. It provides robust, novel evidence on how the math anxiety-achievement relationship is influenced by new factors, including economic prosperity, historical trends, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
What are the key implications for teachers in the classroom?
Teachers play a crucial role in mitigating the debilitating effects of math anxiety by shaping the classroom environment and providing targeted support. The study highlights several key implications and actionable strategies for educators:
Assess Both Anxiety and Achievement: To effectively assist students, educators need to use reliable and valid assessment tools that evaluate both mathematical knowledge and math anxiety. Because math anxiety impairs working memory, attention, and cognitive processing, teachers must look beyond academic test scores alone to fully address the emotional and cognitive barriers preventing students from learning.
Adapt Instructional Strategies: Teachers can reduce the negative relationship between math anxiety and achievement by reviewing previously learned material and providing previews of upcoming lessons. Furthermore, teachers should demonstrate a variety of problem-solving strategies and actively support struggling learners, which builds students’ confidence in their educators’ ability to help them succeed.
Foster a Low-Stakes Environment: It is highly beneficial to avoid creating a strictly “test-like” classroom environment that places a heavy emphasis on success and failure. Minimising constant evaluations by teachers or peers can reduce the evaluative pressures and unfavourable social comparison processes that are known to trigger and exacerbate math anxiety.
Provide Socioemotional and Cognitive Support: Consistent socioemotional and cognitive support from teachers can effectively mitigate the negative impacts of low math achievement on anxiety, and vice versa. Integrating socioemotional learning directly into the curriculum helps students better manage both the cognitive and affective demands of learning mathematics.
Implement Targeted Interventions: Teachers should utilise specific interventions, ideally starting at a young age, to break the self-reinforcing cycle of math avoidance and poor performance. These do not have to be resource-heavy; they can include low-cost, “light touch” methods, such as having students engage in expressive writing about their math anxiety right before taking a test.
Why might teachers exercise caution before applying these findings in their classroom?
Teachers should exercise caution because the study relies on low-stakes standardised tests, meaning findings might not fully translate to high-stakes classroom exams with personal consequences. Additionally, the data excludes early childhood education (below Grade 4) and foundational math skills, such as basic number sense.
What is a single quote that summarises the key findings from the paper?
Our analysis revealed negative relationships between math anxiety and math achievement, observed to varying degrees across countries, grade levels, age groups, and genders; among individuals with low, average, and high math achievement; and across facets of math anxiety and math subdomains
