- Title: The components of direct instruction
- Authors: Watkins and Slocum
- Access the original paper here
- Listen to a deep-dive podcast:
Paper summary
This article outlines Direct Instruction (DI), an educational approach emphasizing efficient teaching for universal student mastery. It details three core components: program design, which includes analyzing content for “big ideas,” ensuring clear communication via five juxtaposition principles (wording, setup, difference, sameness, and testing), structuring instructional formats with gradual shifts from overt to covert strategies, and sequencing skills logically; organization of instruction, covering flexible grouping, maximizing academic learning time, utilizing scripted presentations, and continuous assessment; and teacher-student interactions, involving active student participation, group unison and individual responding, precise signaling, brisk pacing, teaching to mastery, and immediate, direct correction procedures. The text concludes by presenting extensive research findings, including the Project Follow Through evaluation, which demonstrate DI’s effectiveness across diverse learners and age groups, differentiating it from general “direct instruction” methods.
If teachers remember one thing from this study, it should be…
If teachers remember one thing, it should be that Direct Instruction is consistently effective for teaching all students, including those with diverse learning needs, to master subject matter efficiently and comprehensively across basic, cognitive, and affective areas.
***Paper Deep Dive***
Define any technical terms used in the paper
Scripted Presentation: Detailed, pre-planned teacher explanations, examples, and wording for consistent, precise delivery.
Direct Instruction (DI): An integrated system of curriculum and instruction.
General Case Programming: Designing instruction to teach generalized skills or “big ideas” for broad application.
Tracks: Sequences of activities within lessons that develop skills across multiple lessons and support cumulative review.
Instructional Formats: Structures specifying how teachers present examples, ask questions, and provide corrections.
Group Unison Responding: All students orally answering a question simultaneously, akin to a choir.
Teaching to Mastery: Ensuring students perform skills at high levels (e.g., 90-100% accuracy) before moving to new material.
What are the characteristics of the participants in the study?
The main study, Project Follow Through, included nearly 100,000 economically disadvantaged children (K-3) across 170 U.S. communities. Participants exhibited diverse IQ levels (low to high) and various learning needs and language backgrounds.
What does this paper add to the current field of research?
This paper defines Direct Instruction as an integrated system of curriculum and instruction, detailing its three core components. It significantly adds by thoroughly reviewing Project Follow Through, demonstrating DI was the sole model consistently effective across basic skills, cognitive-conceptual, and affective measures for diverse learners.
What are the key implications for teachers in the classroom?
For teachers in the classroom, the key implications of Direct Instruction (DI) are multifaceted and cover planning, delivery, and interaction:
Continuously Assess: Teachers must use ongoing, in-program assessments to monitor student progress and make data-driven decisions about placement, pacing, and additional practice, rather than relying on “hunches”.
Implement Carefully Designed Programs: Teachers utilize DI’s scripted presentations which are meticulously planned and field-tested, relieving them of the burden of instructional design. Their role becomes akin to an actor’s: bringing the script to life with warmth, excitement, and adjustments for individual student needs, such as pacing.
Organize for Success: Teachers must group students flexibly based on their current skill levels and needs, continuously adjusting groups as students progress. They must also allocate sufficient instructional time and use it efficiently, ensuring students are actively engaged in tasks they can perform with high success (academic learning time).
Maximize Active Engagement and Feedback: Teachers should facilitate active student participation to enhance learning, manage behavior, and gain insight into skill levels. This often involves group unison responding for short, common answers, coordinated by precise signals to ensure simultaneous responses. Individual turns are also crucial, especially after group mastery.
Maintain a Brisk Pace and Teach to Mastery: Teachers are expected to maintain a brisk instructional pace to cover more material, sustain attention, and reduce off-task behavior. Crucially, they must teach to mastery, ensuring all students, especially those who struggle, achieve high accuracy (e.g., 90-100%) on skills before moving on. This guarantees preparedness for subsequent material.
Provide Immediate and Direct Corrections: Teachers must notice every error and provide immediate, direct corrections by reteaching and retesting. The basic procedure involves model-test-retest, sometimes with a lead step, and corrections are typically delivered to the whole group to benefit all, unless it’s an individual response.
Foster Motivation Through Success: Teachers create motivation by ensuring students experience high levels of success through appropriate placement and well-delivered instruction. They should frequently praise student effort and progress, make success visible, and minimize attention to undesirable behavior, focusing on “catching them being good”.
Why might teachers exercise caution before applying these findings in their classroom?
Teachers might exercise caution because Direct Instruction (DI) is an integrated system of curriculum and instruction, not merely a set of general techniques. Successful implementation demands precise program design, including clear communication and skill sequencing, careful organization of instruction like flexible grouping and efficient time use, and specific teacher-student interaction techniques. If any element is not well-executed, even superior efforts in other areas may not compensate.
What is a single quote that summarises the key findings from the paper?
As can be seen, the Direct Instruction model was the only model to demonstrate significant positive outcomes on basic skills measures, cognitive–conceptual measures, and affective measures.
